« Eccentric Legal Knowledge | Main | Addictive (courtesy of my brother) »

Volokh on Solomon and Perspective

I spent a good bit of this weekend discussing various gender rights issues with a very charming young lady from a California law school, who was in town to attend the Lavender Law conference at Fordham.

As a result, the Solomon Amendment came up again, as it seems to be doing more and more frequently in the blogosphere, law schools, and the newspaper. The 'wisdom of Solomon' is certainly being called into question as never before.

Which is why I was happy Prof. Volokh linked to his old article on Solomon and perspective. I've remembered this one ever since I read it, on the basis of practicality alone:

Some boycotts are purely instrumental: They aim to make things costly for some entity, so that the entity changes its ways to avoid those costs. But surely this isn't the issue here. If the military changes its policy, it won't be because they're having a slightly harder time recruiting lawyers; the boycott just can't make that sort of practical difference. What's more, officers coming from (say) Yale Law School would likely be more tolerant of homosexuality than the average officer. As a purely practical matter, discouraging Yalies from joining the military may make the military slightly less gay-rights-friendly.

So, of, course the boycott isn't really about practical questions — it's about morality and symbolism.


Indeed, one would think if you wanted to change the military as a system, your best bet (if you're straight but sympathetic) would be to join JAG. Certainly military experience might teach some campaigners the wisdom of not ceding a field to one's enemies.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.threeyearsofhell.com/cgi-user/mt/mtPleaseLinktoMe.cgi/203

Comments

Quoth Anthony: Indeed, one would think if you wanted to change the military as a system, your best bet (if you're straight but sympathetic) would be to join JAG. Your heart's in the right place, but as an ex-Navy JAG I have grave doubts that this is going to work. If you want to change the military as a system, your best bet is to get yourself elected to Congress, and once there to persuade enough other Congresscritters to change the laws to explicitly make it illegal for the military to discriminate against gays. Your next best bet might be to get yourself elected President (or become a very close and trusted advisor to someone else who gets elected President) and use the authority of the office of Commander in Chief of the Armed Services to force the military to stop discriminating (but good luck there, at least one President in recent memory couldn't get it done...). Problem is, JAGs don't make policy, they take orders and obey them. Basically, line officers view JAGs as an obstacle to getting done what they believe needs to be done. Most Generals and Admirals of my acquaintance (and I met a few in the Navy) would be very sympathetic to the quote attributed to J.P. Morgan: "Damn it, I don't hire a lawyer to tell me I can't do something. I hire him to tell me how to do what I want!"
Hmm... the 'law and economics' response: Your odds of joining JAG and going up the heirarchy is much higher than that of you becoming a Congressman, or even a President. Now, for any one person, obviously you're better off trying for political office. But your odds of making the 'big win' are slight. On the other hand, as a member of the armed forces you do get to associate with other members of the armed forces and spread your view about. The argument that homosexuals in the military will be bad for unit cohesion or morale is less persuasive if there are voices in those forces saying, "Yes, we'd welcome them." As it is, the demographics of the armed forces are highly different from those of America as a whole, largely because many members of the left have ceded the field, wanting nothing to do with it. (This is, actually, similar to one reason universities are so liberal: how many conservatives, and here I include myself, would never consider a career in academia because they'd be tired of being the lone voice in the wilderness and might not want to live in Chicago?) We can't all be president, but big changes come from small contributions.
Don't ask, Don't tell isnt about "unit cohesivnesS" it's about keeping sexuality out of the work place. If an officer (male) flirts with and hits on another (female) his ass is going to be in trouble. If a female fraternizes with a male, she's in just as much trouble.

Post a comment

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Giving The Devil His Due

I've Always Wanted to Say This: What Do You Want? (14)
Brian wrote: I want a big house. and a 2007 ford... [more]

And like that... he is gone (8)
maggie wrote: I've throughly enjoyed reading you ... [more]

Symbols, Shame, and A Number of Reasons that Billy Idol is Wrong (11)
Perzephone wrote: Phagh! I wore deep burgundy red for... [more]

Post Exam Rant (9)
Richard wrote: while taking a bar certification ex... [more]

Law Firm Technology (5)
Richard Noalnd wrote: You ever heard of AMS-Legal? Law f... [more]

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

cover
D.C. Noir

My city. But darker.
cover
A Clockwork Orange

About time I read this...


Shopping

Projects I've Been Involved With

A Round-the-World Travel Blog: Devil May Care (A new round-the-world travel blog, co-written with my wife)
Parents for Inclusive Education (From my Clinic)

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students

De Novo
Theory and Practice
Liberal Federalism?
Good News, No Foolin'


Althouse
Nancy Pelosi covers her head and visits the head of John the Baptist.
Vlogging in from Austin.
Omikase/"American Idol"


Jeremy Blachman's Weblog: 2007
Happy Passover
Looking for Advice re: LA
Google Books


Stay of Execution
What I've Learned From This Blog, or My Yellow Underpants
The End
Mid Thirties


Legal Theory Blog
Program Announcement: Summer Programs on the Constitution at George Washington
Book Announement: Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy by Whittington
Entry Level Hiring Report


The Volokh Conspiracy
Making the Daily Show:
Civil unions pass New Hampshire House:
Profile of Yale Law Dean Harold Koh:


Crescat Sententia
Hillary II
Hillary
Politics and Principal/Agents


Law Dork
Election Approaches
Following Lewis
New Jersey High Court: 'Same Rights and Benefits'


IrishLaw
Homecoming
Surveying the revival
Birds of paradise


Half the Sins of Mankind
Cheney Has Spoken Religious conservatives who may ...
Does Ahmadinejad Know Christianity Better Than MSN...
Borders as Genocide In discussions of climate chan...


pf.org
Progress
For lovers of garden gnomes...and any China-freaks out there
We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming


Ideoblog
Does SOX explain the flight from NY?
More Litvak on SOX effect on cross-listed firms
What did the market learn from internal controls reporting?


The Yin Blog
Iowa City = Riyadh
Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court"
Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?


Letters of Marque
Graduation
And there we are
Oil!


BuffaloWings&Vodka
Signing Off


Dark Bilious Vapors
Jim (The Waco Kid): Where you headed, cowboy?
Bart: Nowhere special.
Jim: Nowhere special. I always wanted to go there.
Bart: Come on.
--"Blazing Saddles"

Technical Difficulties... please stand by....
The Onion should have gotten a patent first....


Legal Ethics Forum
Interesting new Expert DQ case
Decency, Due Care, and The Yoo-Delahunty Memorandum
Thinking About the Fired U.S. Attorneys


Ex Post
Student Symposium- Chicago!
More Hmong - Now at Law School
Good Samaritan Laws: Good For America?


Appellate Law & Practice
Those turned over documents
CA1: courts can’t help people acquitted of crimes purge the taint of acquitted conduct
CA1: restrictions on chain liquor stores in Rhode Island are STILL okay


the imbroglio
High schoolers turn in plagiarism screeners for copyright infringement
talisman
Paris to offer 20,600 bikes at 1,450 stations to rent by the end of the year


The Republic of T.
The Secret of the Snack Attack
links for 2007-04-04
Where You Link is What You Get

Distractions for stressed law students

The Other Side: Twisted AnimationsSomething Positive, a truly good webcomic

Syndicate This Site

Sitemeter

Technologies


Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot