« CIV PRO: CODE INFRARED | Main | OK, one more before bed »

Can someone sick McKinnon on them?

And, from the idiot fringe of the World Wide Whacko, I give you: Babes Against Bush. (Warning: not work safe.) Yes, you too can now buy the cheesecake calendar working to defeat the President.

Seems they're upset by a few complaints from some conservatives. In the best tradition of 'argue against what you wish your critics were saying':

Is it because a group consisting primarily of women is having the audacity to express views that aren't in lockstep synch with your hordes of button-down establishment pundits? Is it because common people - those ordinarily without access to the power of the broadcast media - have managed to make their voices heard above the din of the propagandistic garbage your media empires peddle as news? Is it because the inevitable dissent arising from abuses of governmental, corporate, and media power is somehow painful to you?

No, honey. It's that when adults play politics, we do it with our clothes on.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.threeyearsofhell.com/cgi-user/mt/mtPleaseLinktoMe.cgi/310

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Can someone sick McKinnon on them?:

» Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dum from The Curmudgeonly Clerk
Anthony Rickey has accorded as much respect to this enterprise as it deserves. Not to be outdone in setting back... [Read More]

» Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dum from The Curmudgeonly Clerk
Anthony Rickey has accorded as much respect to this enterprise as it deserves. Not to be outdone in setting back... [Read More]

Comments

"No, honey. It's that when adults play politics, we do it with our clothes on."

Well, except Clinton's pants. ;-)

cypruqa kyyoigue

Your last comment is remarkably dismissive of a creative forum for free speech. Maybe you should critique their message rather than their method because, obviously, it got your attention enough to make you look.

qahd

Adam, just because I recognize their right to free speech doesn't mean I have to respect it. Some things are simply inappropriate--were I to hand in my Civ Pro takehome with attached pictures from Playboy, I would have upheld my right to free speech while similarly being a fool.

Yes, it got me to take a look, but in such a way that even were they to be making a decent argument (and frankly, the level of discourse at Babes Against Bush isn't high enough to be worthy of debate), I'd dismiss them anyway. In this case, the medium is the message.

Now, back to my Civ Pro paper...

mgphoe

Perhaps. But I'm not sure that it's *so* inappropriate. Of course it can be construed as such, but it's accomplishing their goal of getting guys who wouldn't otherwise think politics to at least think about the issue for a second (albeit while ogling a pair of breasts).

Anyway, I think this comes down to a difference of opinion. :) Good luck on Civ Pro. That class is no fun.

Adam, gimme a break. :)

The idea is self-evidently ridiculous. Do you really think that a guy who has just tuned in to look at (not very good) porn is all of a sudden going to think: "Oh, wait! A political monologue. Well, hell, they've got my vote!"

You also miss the slightly finer point that yes, I'm being dismissive--in reponse to a quote which is every bit, if not more, dismissive of its opposition. Babes Against Bush doesn't present an argument but invective, and I responded in kind.

Just with a bit more wit, if I do say so myself. ;)

xhjyrw

Well, in much the same way as pictures of attractive women are used to sell cars (a picture of a girl! With long legs! I'll buy a Clio) or soft drinks (Britney Spears, Dancing! with few clothes! I'll have a Pepsi!) this will actually succeed in getting a few people to read the political diatribe.

On the other hand, I haven't looked but I suspect it may actually be an attempt to sell pornography to the politically active rather than vice versa. (Well honey, I was just looking at these political sites and suddenly there was porn! [at which point I abandoned politics and looked at the porn instead] Its not like the porn industry doesn't do a lot of this kind of thing)

Anyway, Merry Christmas Mr Rickey and congratulations on completing your exams.

engwswf lacf

Adam...respect your opinion 'n' all, but you're wrong, pal.

Happened across your comments during a random google search of BAB mentions, and you came up. Clearly you don't understand some of what's going on with our site (or are too biased to read any of the articles we've posted, or follow any of the links we've thrown up to misc. and sundry progressive political sites). The core mission of BAB was to make people aware that opposition to Bush _exists_, period. Not that WE are in a position to unseat him; rather, that those curious enough to look - and there have been plenty, over a million so far - might be moved to follow some of the links, read some of the info, and at least consider some of the arguments against Bush.

Don't believe that it works? All I can tell you is that the owner of one site we've linked to has told me that he's had a tenfold increase in traffic. Sure, we used the sex "bait" to draw people in, but the content has drawn at least some in further - which is what we set out to do.

Meanwhile, what have you accomplished lately?

David/BabesAgainstBush

pyhgvv

Kept my soul and done my political thinking without having to bare young women's breasts.

David, it's not that I don't understand. (Nor, indeed, that I'm too biased to look at your articles.) But if you think you have to put up a porn site to make people aware that opposition to Bush exists, you live in your own little conspiracy-theory world in which the media is a one-sided monster. Last I noticed, there's at least eight candidates who are opposing Bush in a manner befitting a Democratic society.

You got a lot of click-throughs by putting up a porn site? You've raised 'awareness'? Wow. I've had coffee and doughnuts for breakfast, and short of causing a few erections, it's probably more than BAB has accomplished...

zgrvrm

Post a comment

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Alienware Purgatory Counter

The "onsite" support policy I purchased required me to send my computer back to the depot. I really miss having a working notebook.

Alienware has taken this long to return my computer:
Just over sixteen days! Give a round of applause!

Exam Watch

Exam Stress Level SEVERE
So relaxed, I forgot to update the threat warning for two days.

Securities Law : DONE
Federal Courts : DONE

Giving The Devil His Due

Stop Thinking Like A Lawyer (1)
VaBarTaker wrote: i love your exam stress advisory. w... [more]

Why Not Just Ask The Real Question: Is It A Good Game? (4)
A. Rickey wrote: A good friend of mine where I used ... [more]

Great News for British Legal Consumers (2)
A. Rickey wrote: Well, remember, before anything hap... [more]

D.C.'s Finest Taxi Service (2)
Martin Lloyd wrote: I think it looks like a shoebox. Ho... [more]

Ugh... (2)
A. Rickey wrote: As I said, ugh. Ross Perot's third... [more]

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

cover
Fly By Night

If you ask me, I'm betting on the goose
cover
Anonymous Lawyer

OK, so not all that anonymous anymore. . .


Shopping

Projects I've Been Involved With

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students

De Novo
Theory and Practice
Liberal Federalism?
Good News, No Foolin'


Althouse
Nancy Pelosi covers her head and visits the head of John the Baptist.
Vlogging in from Austin.
Omikase/"American Idol"


Jeremy Blachman's Weblog: 2007
Happy Passover
Looking for Advice re: LA
Google Books


Stay of Execution
What I've Learned From This Blog, or My Yellow Underpants
The End
Mid Thirties


Legal Theory Blog
Program Announcement: Summer Programs on the Constitution at George Washington
Book Announement: Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy by Whittington
Entry Level Hiring Report


The Volokh Conspiracy
Making the Daily Show:
Civil unions pass New Hampshire House:
Profile of Yale Law Dean Harold Koh:


Crescat Sententia
Hillary II
Hillary
Politics and Principal/Agents


Law Dork
Election Approaches
Following Lewis
New Jersey High Court: 'Same Rights and Benefits'


IrishLaw
Homecoming
Surveying the revival
Birds of paradise


Half the Sins of Mankind
Cheney Has Spoken Religious conservatives who may ...
Does Ahmadinejad Know Christianity Better Than MSN...
Borders as Genocide In discussions of climate chan...


pf.org
Progress
For lovers of garden gnomes...and any China-freaks out there
We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming


Ideoblog
Does SOX explain the flight from NY?
More Litvak on SOX effect on cross-listed firms
What did the market learn from internal controls reporting?


The Yin Blog
Iowa City = Riyadh
Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court"
Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?


Letters of Marque
Graduation
And there we are
Oil!


BuffaloWings&Vodka
Signing Off


Dark Bilious Vapors
Jim (The Waco Kid): Where you headed, cowboy?
Bart: Nowhere special.
Jim: Nowhere special. I always wanted to go there.
Bart: Come on.
--"Blazing Saddles"

Technical Difficulties... please stand by....
The Onion should have gotten a patent first....


Legal Ethics Forum
Interesting new Expert DQ case
Decency, Due Care, and The Yoo-Delahunty Memorandum
Thinking About the Fired U.S. Attorneys


Ex Post
Student Symposium- Chicago!
More Hmong - Now at Law School
Good Samaritan Laws: Good For America?


Appellate Law & Practice
Those turned over documents
CA1: courts can’t help people acquitted of crimes purge the taint of acquitted conduct
CA1: restrictions on chain liquor stores in Rhode Island are STILL okay


the imbroglio
High schoolers turn in plagiarism screeners for copyright infringement
talisman
Paris to offer 20,600 bikes at 1,450 stations to rent by the end of the year


The Republic of T.
The Secret of the Snack Attack
links for 2007-04-04
Where You Link is What You Get

Distractions for stressed law students

The Other Side: Twisted AnimationsSomething Positive, a truly good webcomic

Syndicate This Site

Sitemeter

Technologies


Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot