« Now, I Didn't See THAT Coming... | Main | Here, here! »

The Strangeness of Google

[Sparked by an entry at Stay of Execution. If you've got any knowledge of the Google phenomena below, I'd appreciate it.]

Every so often, I do a 'strange search terms' entry, which highlights Google searches in which I'm a particularly high result, despite the fact that I really don't write on that subject. Whilst this is funny, it's also a result of my interest in search engines that goes back to when I used to (with the help of some very good researchers) do this professionally.

Right at the moment, I can't help but think that Google is giving more authority to bloggers than perhaps we deserve, and that other search engines or services that aren't as 'fine-tuned' may be even more deceived. There's no scientific basis for this theory--though if one of the experts I mention above can provide one, I'd be very interested. However, the ease with which I get references to uncommon terms, or even common ones such as 'Paris Hilton,' leads me to think that I now possess an authority greater than I warrant. Just gut feelings, but this is what I've noticed recently:

There are a number of ways of increasing your inbound links that have nothing to do with your authority on a subject:
The two primary culprits here seem to be trackback pings and, more importantly, comments. For instance, while the number of visitors I receive to this site has increased only marginally (about 20%) over the last few months, my PageRank has gone from 5 to 6, equal to blogs like En Banc and Crescat Sententia (though a rank below The Volokh Conspiracy). I don't have anywhere near their readership.

On the other hand, I have a loud mouth and a habit of commenting on other blogs. Doing a Google search for blogs that link to mine, I find quite a few hits that are nothing more than comments that I've left on others blogs. From this, it seems that I'm generating my own publicity, and indeed my own Google Juice.

I would think that Google would cut back on the 'authority' of such posts, and so long as most blogs keep a standard format (comments on pop-up or individual entry pages) then that's fine: the vast majority of 'self-generated publicity' can be weeded out by altering the search patterns of Googlebots. But what happens when the pattern becomes non-standard? For instance, over on Crescat I get an inbound link on both Google and Technorati whenever I post a trackback ping to their site. This would seem a bit more difficult to modify in Google's rankings.

When Google does modify things, my PageRank is likely to plummet
The caveat to the above should be that I'm judging PageRank solely on the Google Taskbar, which may not give accurate rankings. But at the moment, it seems to consider me a six, and I get a certain amount of perverse pride from that. Still, as mentioned above I think much of this is artificial, and I expect a plunge soon.

All told, I'm not sure this is a bad thing. As I've noted, many of my inbound links are for subjects on which I'm definitely not speaking. (My classic example is misty rain piercings, which for a while ranked me above not only most porn sites, but even above such more topical sites as SuicideGirls (warning: not work safe).) I'd rather have people coming here because they're interested in my personal experiences at law school or my political views, not in a sure-to-be-disappointed search for porn.

Further, getting rid of the 'Google Juice' one gets from comments would probably cut down on the activities of comment-spammers (those odd, random, and inappropriate comments you sometimes find here before I delete them), because a lot of the value would go out of them. So despite my pride, it might not be a bad thing.

Some of the best methods of 'audience building' may not be entirely above board
A couple of new bloggers have asked me recently, 'How do you build an audience.' My general advice is 'write often, write well, and fill your niche.' But obviously, one of the best ways is to increase your ranking on Google. And based on what seem to be my 'results', the best way of doing that would seem to be:

1: Make extensive use of trackback pings to other, higher-page rank blogs; and
2: Comment frequently on same. (Make sure that you leave your name and a link back to your site.)

On the other hand, I'm really not sure this is the best way to attract readers directly, and not something I'd suggest simply to increase one's readership. Not because it wouldn't work (I think it would), but simply because it would lead to a lot of irrelevant, banal, and uninteresting comments left by people who have little to say, and just want to push themselves up in Google's esteem.

Anyway, these are just guesses at what may or may not happen in the next few months. Anyone who has some more fact-based assertions, feel free to comment.


TrackBack URL for this entry:


You're right. The more and better you write, and the more assidiously you link to other folk the better you will do. It also makes a world of difference if you've got a niche. I used to have a nice over at www.mba-experience.com , these days I don't. This makes my writing less focused, my audience don't know what to expect and so aside from the family and friends I'm writing for I don't pick up extra readers. Oh, and I write for me too, I'm my biggest reader. I think its theraputic. Not sure about the comments stuff though. Conventional wisdom used to be that this kind of thing (along with signing guestbooks) was penalised by Google. I suspect they've had to drop that when commenting became so common (I don't *know* this) and that right now they have a problem with it. Stick to writing well and on a limited number of topics is the best way to build an audience.
One thing to note is that Google's "PageRank" algorithm isn't just about number of links in a naive sense. To quote from Google's technology page : Votes cast by pages that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make other pages "important." I suspect this does a lot to inflate the importance of blogs, because bloggers link to each other all the time. Run round a few iterations of this and blogs increase rapidly in rank because all their incoming links are from reasonably rated sites (other blogs). That'd be my guess, anyway.
There was much discussion last year about the possibility that Google would remove weblogs from its main search engine. This never came to pass. There is no doubt, however, that weblogs are favored by Google (as can be demonstrated by experimenting with searches for your own), probably because of the frequency with which weblogs are updated. I think the assumption is the most recent entry on a particuar topic is likely to be the most relevant, so it comes up higher in the hits. Meanwhile, things *have* been changing recently at Google--search for news about the "Florida Update" or look at scroogle.org. (Personally, I'm glad that weblogs seem to be favored over static websites -- I hope it lasts).
I noticed a similar dynamic on Blogstreet's rating of my blog. The give you two numbers, Blog Rank and Blog IQ (BIQ). Blog Rank is a function of raw links to your site, while BIQ is a function of the importance of who links to you (similar to Google PageRank). My site is 31709 / 145080 on Rank, but 3552 on BIQ, because while I have few sites linking to me, I have some "important" ones that do (How Appealing, Bag and Baggae, JD2B). http://www.blogstreet.com/bin/profile.cgi?url=falconred.llarian.net

Post a comment

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Giving The Devil His Due

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

D.C. Noir

My city. But darker.
A Clockwork Orange

About time I read this...


Projects I've Been Involved With

A Round-the-World Travel Blog: Devil May Care (A new round-the-world travel blog, co-written with my wife)
Parents for Inclusive Education (From my Clinic)

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students

De Novo
Theory and Practice
Liberal Federalism?
Good News, No Foolin'

Nancy Pelosi covers her head and visits the head of John the Baptist.
Vlogging in from Austin.
Omikase/"American Idol"

Jeremy Blachman's Weblog: 2007
Happy Passover
Looking for Advice re: LA
Google Books

Stay of Execution
What I've Learned From This Blog, or My Yellow Underpants
The End
Mid Thirties

Legal Theory Blog
Program Announcement: Summer Programs on the Constitution at George Washington
Book Announement: Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy by Whittington
Entry Level Hiring Report

The Volokh Conspiracy
Making the Daily Show:
Civil unions pass New Hampshire House:
Profile of Yale Law Dean Harold Koh:

Crescat Sententia
Hillary II
Politics and Principal/Agents

Law Dork
Election Approaches
Following Lewis
New Jersey High Court: 'Same Rights and Benefits'

Surveying the revival
Birds of paradise

Half the Sins of Mankind
Cheney Has Spoken Religious conservatives who may ...
Does Ahmadinejad Know Christianity Better Than MSN...
Borders as Genocide In discussions of climate chan...

For lovers of garden gnomes...and any China-freaks out there
We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming

Does SOX explain the flight from NY?
More Litvak on SOX effect on cross-listed firms
What did the market learn from internal controls reporting?

The Yin Blog
Iowa City = Riyadh
Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court"
Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?

Letters of Marque
And there we are

Signing Off

Dark Bilious Vapors
Jim (The Waco Kid): Where you headed, cowboy?
Bart: Nowhere special.
Jim: Nowhere special. I always wanted to go there.
Bart: Come on.
--"Blazing Saddles"

Technical Difficulties... please stand by....
The Onion should have gotten a patent first....

Legal Ethics Forum
Interesting new Expert DQ case
Decency, Due Care, and The Yoo-Delahunty Memorandum
Thinking About the Fired U.S. Attorneys

Ex Post
Student Symposium- Chicago!
More Hmong - Now at Law School
Good Samaritan Laws: Good For America?

Appellate Law & Practice
Those turned over documents
CA1: courts can’t help people acquitted of crimes purge the taint of acquitted conduct
CA1: restrictions on chain liquor stores in Rhode Island are STILL okay

the imbroglio
High schoolers turn in plagiarism screeners for copyright infringement
Paris to offer 20,600 bikes at 1,450 stations to rent by the end of the year

The Republic of T.
The Secret of the Snack Attack
links for 2007-04-04
Where You Link is What You Get

Distractions for stressed law students

The Other Side: Twisted AnimationsSomething Positive, a truly good webcomic

Syndicate This Site



Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot