Do They Sexually Harass People On Boats?
I'm working on my outline (due tomorrow) for my moot court case. After a semester of Civ Pro that focused heavily on Title VII sexual harassment claims, and the prospect of yet another such case in moot court, I'd like to say:
Would the fiction men of the world please stop harassing the fictional women of the world so that I can stop defending their fictional employers???
Seriously, next year I'm going to take Tax, Admiralty, Bankruptcy... anything that keeps me away from Title-bloody-VII. Columbia seems to be conspiring to turn me into a man defending the employers of lecherous men.
Comments
Well, we have to face it, this is the world we are living in, full of lecherous men harrassing hot employees. I don't want to specify the sex of the employees, because nowadays, they chase both. However, I wish we would hear more about women bosses harassing their employees (both sexes again). I believe that the employees in such case don't mind.
visit me @ http://2lawschool.blog-city.com
svechnPosted by: Iysam Atwan | February 2, 2004 12:58 PM
I'm not sure I agree: anyone being harassed is going to find the position uncomfortable.
But that said, my major gripe is that I seem, completely randomly, to be drawing the classes that force me to focus on Title VII, which isn't my major interest.
Posted by: Anthony Rickey | February 2, 2004 05:26 PM
Tony,
gkbsmzvYou think Janet Jackson can sue for a Title VII violation?
Posted by: Avi Frisch | February 2, 2004 05:36 PM
I have to admit, I didn't get to see Ms. Jackson bare all on TV. I'm sure there's a net link somewhere...
Posted by: Anthony Rickey | February 2, 2004 06:13 PM
Check drudgereport.com, he has closeups!
lgokPosted by: Avi Frisch | February 2, 2004 08:35 PM
Quoth Anthony: "anyone being harassed is going to find the position uncomfortable."
Correct by definition, sir. IIRC, if the attention is welcome, it isn't harassment. I can't give you the cite to the statute or regulation, but I was given to believe that's how it's defined in the relevant statutes.
Posted by: Len Cleavelin | February 3, 2004 01:41 PM
I didn't say it was a staggering work of genius, Len. ;)
gshswpPosted by: Anthony | February 3, 2004 01:46 PM
Admiralty is a great class---seriously. It's the weirdest thing to hear, but it's fascinating. Not so much with Tax.
cnmnfPosted by: Tony the Pony | February 6, 2004 12:33 AM