Hearts and Minds, Fear and Love
An entry on Republic of T made me curious. Pondering an American air strike that resulted in significant collateral damage, he says:
Destroyed: three houses, two families, women and children. Al Quaeda figures killed in the attack: 0. Hearts and minds of Iraqis won: 0.
I first of all question his analysis of the Iraqi populace as a solid opinion block: my suspicion is that given the amount of factional striving in Iraq, as well as the rational knowledge that those who are harboring 'resistance' units aren't really 'civilian' in anything but a technical sense, members of some factions might even approve. After all, many of the factions have a penchant for blowing up Iraqis as well.
But even assuming that no one approved, I wonder at that 'hearts and minds' comment. After all, one doesn't merely win hearts and minds by getting a populace to love you. As Machiavellli famously put it:
And here comes in the question whether it is better to be loved rather than feared, or feared rather than loved. It might perhaps be answered that we should wish to be both; but since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved.
For some reason, this thought jarred in my memory: wasn't there something in The Prince about just this sort of situation? And I was pleased to find my memory hadn't failed me. It's right in the same chapter:
And for a new Prince, of all others, it is impossible to escape a name for cruelty, since new States are full of dangers. Wherefore Virgil, by the mouth of Dido, excuses the harshness of her reign on the plea that it was new, saying:��A fate unkind, and newness in my reign
Compel me thus to guard a wide domain.�
Nevertheless, the new Prince should not be too ready of belief, nor too easily set in motion; nor should he himself be the first to raise alarms; but should so temper prudence with kindliness that too great confidence in others shall not throw him off his guard, nor groundless distrust render him insupportable.
Guess my memory isn't as bad as I thought. Though it must be said, the rest of the passage lends little in the way of support for Bush's current policies.
Comments
Posted by: russell | June 21, 2004 5:09 AM
Posted by: A. Rickey | June 21, 2004 5:39 AM
Posted by: Sarah | June 21, 2004 1:16 PM
Posted by: martin | June 23, 2004 12:18 PM
Posted by: A. Rickey | June 23, 2004 12:38 PM
Posted by: Martin | June 24, 2004 3:54 AM