« Poll Watching, Stock Watching | Main | Hope For the World »

Do You Hear That Sound? That's The Knell of Apathy

I never thought I would say this. Indeed, if you had shown me the words I'm about to write through a time machine when I was idly chatting in July, I'd have laughed in your face. But here's the truth: I am thoroughly, thoroughly burnt out on politics.

Since I was old enough to vote, I've never lived through an election in the United States. In 1992, I had just started my first year of university in England, and 1996 found me returning to Oxford from Osaka. In both cases I voted by absentee ballot. I didn't even vote in 2000: I'd moved so many times I couldn't figure out what state I could vote in. (Before anyone blames me for Bush v. Gore, the only options were Texas and Michigan: I don't think my confusion as to my home state threw the election to Rhenquist and Co.) But I have never had to live through the barrage of news, ads, and ridiculous commentary without the comforting filter of British insouciance. [1]

My god, what I wasn't missing. Look, I'm a Bush voter, and I can't really imagine what could happen at this point to make me move from the Republican Party, so I suppose the election's been done for me for several months. But I'd vote for Kerry if the election could be held tomorrow, just to get the damn thing over with. It's not just that I've already decided. It's that the trivia and the overheated rhetoric is getting to me.

Let's just count the non-sensical things that have absorbed the debate in the last few months. Remember the Swift Boat Vets? With due respect, I don't care if Kerry bribed his senior officers to give him purple hearts as part of his payoff for covering up a heroin ring. The statute of limitations of my attention--and my ability to believe anything can be "proven"--has run. Now otherwise sensible people are asking if Kerry is barred from the presidency by the 14th Amendment.. (Note: link is to Volokh disagreeing with the thesis.)

Ditto for anything to do with Bush skipping out on National Guard service, whether or not the evidence comes from phantasmal and phantasmagoric IBM Selectric Composers. It would be like judging whether a firm should hire me by asking what I was doing back in 1975. Christmas 1975 isn't exactly "seared into my memory," but I'm pretty sure it involved a great deal of chronic irresponsibility (as well as soiled diapers).

But even if those things are fading, the relentless trivia of this election just won't end. Here's Paul Krugman talking, yet again, about that draft that's just around the corner. You know. That old rumor introduced by two threatening bills about which Professor Leiter once said: "the fact that these bills were introduced by Democrats will be hugely advantageous as the Bush Administration has to confront the deteriorating military situation in Iraq and Afghanistan..." Yeah, well, the Bush Administration, or rather, his proxy Republicans in Congress, pushed those bills to the floor a while ago. They passed it by a resounding 402 to 2 vote. Oh hell, I'm sorry, that's what it failed by. Rangel didn't even vote for it, which literally made this an issue not even its father could love.

Then we have the litany of requests for apologies. Cheney curses out a Senator on the floor. Kerry makes hay out of Cheney's lesbian daughter. [2] Now Teresa Heinz-Kerry lets a new one rip from the ketchup-bottle.

You know, I'd give my vote, my pledge of eternal alligiance, perhaps my very soul by contract to the candidate who said, "I'm going to make you this promise at the outset of my campaign. I'm not going to say anything bad about my opponent, who is a fine man. And if one of my supporters does, I'll send away his money. If that supporter happens to be sitting next to me, I promise I'll spit in his face." Now that doesn't count rational statements of policy: both candidates have been accused of saying that if the other is elected, we're more likely to suffer a terrorist attack, and I hope they both believe it. If they don't, they don't think their anti-terrorism policy is substantively better than the other guy's. But stop with the mud.

And finally, I'm just sick of the strident tone. Without any particular focus on any particular blogger, let's look at some of what I've been reading, hearing, and seeing recently:

  • The Guardian's "write a voter in Ohio" campaign and the commentary about it. Yeah, it's a real shock when you spam a bundle of random addresses that you get hatemail back. And note that while the Guardian has published some of the replies they've gotten, they've not posted the letters sent. Sure, they said to be polite, but anyone want to bet on 100% compliance? How many randoms got Gruaniad-style rants?
  • Again, from Professor Heller: I Honestly Think This Is the Scariest Quote I've Ever Read. An unattributed, unnamed source quoted by a hack with an axe to grind? Christ, I've read scarier in reviews of Resident Evil: Apocalypse. Come to think of it, the fact that movie got the green-light is scarier.
  • Or from Carey over at Gondolin: "If George Will is excited, we should be scared." (Also describing the normally-sober Will as "drooling.")
  • Any number of my associates declaring that, "If Bush wins, I may have to leave the country."

Folks, this is ridiculous. Look, there is nothing, and I mean nothing in what's listed above, what's been mentioned in the debates, or what random pundits might be "drooling" over that should inspire fear. Sixty years ago, the architect of modern liberalism was telling us how our greatest fear should be fear itself. In 2004, everywhere I turn someone's telling me that I should be petrified of George W. Bush.

Now I know why some people find Wes Craven scary.

As I mentioned at the beginning of this rant, I did spend most of the Clinton years out of the country. But let me say emphatically: the fear of a draft-dodger winning in 1992 did not drive me away from these shores. Nor does the possibility of a Kerry victory influence my firm decisions, tipping the balance towards London or Tokyo and away from New York. I don't think there's anyone who could get elected in the United States that would make me ashamed of my nation, unless the Democrats nominate Michael Moore in 2008 in a mammoth fit of pique. I've never told anyone that I was anything but American when I was overseas, and don't figure I'll start now.

I can understand that some people think Bush's policies are wrong. I can even go so far as to see how someone could dislike him, distrust him, disagree with him, or even diss him. But this continual litany of fear, this wearing of sackcloth for the sins of Bush II, this near-despair by the Kerryites... was it this miserable at the end of the elections I missed?

[1]: Incidentally, the BBC coverage of Election Night is always, always better than the American version, because they don't take it entirely seriously. First of all, once it's past midnight the coverage is handled by second-string announcers and American commentators who couldn't get onto FOX/MSNBC/CNNHL/WTBS/WKRP. Seeing folks who aren't used to being "crack dream team punditry" handle the tips and turns of the 2000 election was a riot in and of itself. But even better is the BBC's resident Swingometer-in-Chief, Peter Snow, who assaults the viewer with a variety of computer-generated graphics as "visual aids." The 2000 election, for instance, displayed the "Race for the White House," in which two little medallions of the candidates races towards a cartoon White House, propelled by little icons representing electoral votes. Snow also brought out his classic "swingometer," which informed viewers exactly how the House of Representatives would be constituted, how the Senate race was going, and who would be Prime Minister if the Americans ran their election like the good ol' Brits. That this last was completely irrelevant to anything was cheerfully ignored.

[2]: And can we have a moment to look at this one? Various people have justified this by making it an issue of Cheney's "hypocrisy," because he supports a president who objects to homosexual marriage when his own daughter is a homosexual. Don't we have to make two assumptions before we get from Kerry's statement to an accusation of hypocrisy? First we have to suppose that Mary Cheney supports homosexual marriage, an assumption I've yet to see proven. There's significant question as to Dick Cheney's opinion. But even after that, we have to assume that both Mary and Dick Cheney feel so strongly about the issue of homosexual marriage that it overrides all other considerations. What if they don't even consider that the prima inter pares among issues this year? Why is it that if one is homosexual, this has to be the issue you care about?

As charges go, this one just doesn't stick. There's nothing hypocritical about supporting a president who disagrees with you on a policy or two.


TrackBack URL for this entry:


Yesterday, I learnt from the radio news that the election has been causing terrible matrimonial friction for Arnold Schwarznegger and his missus. Apparently one row was so severe there was (I quote) "no nookie for two weeks after". This is apparently headline news. In Reading, UK. You've almost tempted me to watch the BBC coverage of the election - something I've never done before. But, y'know, I've so far managed to avoid knowing when election night actually *is* :)
I think the preponderance of stretched truths, contradictions and outright lies in this and other elections is a significant reason for the increasingly low voter turnout. How is anyone expected to form an opinion when the picture is so muddied? Although, I hear that the turnout is expected to go up this year (compared with 2000, presumably), which is nice.
Deep breaths now mate. Deep breaths. Although should you ever feel like writing about politics this side of the election again could you pen an endorsement of your man? Which is to say, not an attack on Kerry. I'd like to know what you see in W. (I find it much easier to see why you'd be a Republican, plenty of good arguments there, I find it harder to see why so many Republicans back Bush though)
Oh good. It pleases me no end to hear that I'm not the only one who is tired of the campaign and more than ready for it to be over. I also made up my mind quite some time ago (fellow Bush supporter), partially because (horror of horrors!) I actually like George W. Bush, partially because I have so many problems with the Democratic party in general, particularly in regards to policies involving minorities. There's dirt under both candidates' nails; only something major - like say, murder - coming to light would make a huge difference to me at this point. Enjoying your writings!
I wish I could be as sanguine as you are about there being no draft if Bush is elected (I'm not sanguine about there being no draft if Kerry is elected, for that matter). From everything I see, Bush and his cabal have so mismanaged Iraq/Afghanistan, and so overcommitted the Army that if anything else happens anywhere in the world that requires U.S. military action, a draft is going to become a necessity. As I have said before, I only wish I saw some evidence that Bush is even thinking about such contingencies.
Oh, come on, Len. First of all, the size of our military is capped by statute: we're currently at the maximum permanent staff figures allowed by law. All of the "we can't find recruits" figures are for the National Guard and the Reserve. The Reserve having problems makes sense: why are you going to sign up for the Reserve at a time when most Reserve units are being deployed anyway? It's mug's odds, you might as well sign up for the Army. The Guard? Well, the only way we need a draft for those figures is if we're going to draft people into the Guard. Hell, I might support that, if only for the irony value of drafting people into the branch that people went into in Vietnam in order to avoid service. But from a practical policy standpoint, as opposed to fodder for John Stewart, it's ridiculous. Neither Rumsfeld nor Cheney support increasing the size of the standing army, for God's sake, which is the origin of this "back door draft." It's not a draft of any sort, it's forcing people to fulfill the contracts they entered into. Unfortunately, it's doing so by forcing them to fulfill parts of their contracts they didn't expect to fulfill. I'd agree with anyone saying that's probably not good for morale and a bad way to run an army--I support increasing the standing size of the forces--but it's not an argument for the imminence of the draft. There's room to increase troop size without a draft--we just have to commit to the long-term costs of increasing force size. In the meantime, the draft remains political suicide for anyone who would seriously put it back into place. America would probably let a world problem fester--or hell, maybe ask some of our "allies" like France and Germany to flex their muscles--rather than reinstate the draft again. It's not politically feasible. Which is precisely why it's a useful instrument for Democratic fearmongers. It's a great argument. I can't prove that a draft won't occur: I don't have a crystal ball. On the other hand, you can't come close to proving it's likely. This is why, when I mock Leiter or someone of his ilk, I use terms like haruspicy or celephanomancy: they're doing nothing more than predicting the future, and poorly at that. You'll note that when someone says no draft is coming, the common reply from the ridiculous left is, "So if one comes, you'll volunteer, right?" But there's never and quid pro quo to that challenge--no one on the other side is ever willing to pony up and bet.
I was actually reading the Guardian supplement today (G2) (paper version) and they published some of the letters sent from here.
heres an army lol Cheney's Tomorrow Never Comes?. Cheney films political comedy link www.customflix.com/207135 Released by: cheney films new release department Web Site: http://www.customflix.com/207135 This film is so funny you will fall off your seat gigling (exoterine reviews) Email: cheneyproductions@yahoo.com Update Date: 5/4/2005 8:41:51 PM Hits: 11335 Descrption: Cheney's Tomorrow Never Comes? link http://www.customflix.com/207135 Cheney's "Tomorrow Never Comes?" a comedy/action film. A newscaster {Mike,played by Art Swenson}has dismal ratings, and is on the verge of being fired.Mike,along with his camera-man, concocts a plan and makes fake terrorist news broadcasts. They broadcast these worldwide. However,in a round about way,Mike finds himself working with a North Korean terrorist(Sonia Nam) and ex-KGB agents(Chris Becker).He is pursued By the CIA, FBI, US Department of state agents and even Canadian Intelliegence! the lines between reality and fantasy blur for the Mike as the film progesses Is it reality, or just a dream? Featuring music by New Jersey recording artist Art "Flesh" Gordon Contact infomation: cheneyproductions@yahoo.com

Post a comment

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Giving The Devil His Due

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

D.C. Noir

My city. But darker.
A Clockwork Orange

About time I read this...


Projects I've Been Involved With

A Round-the-World Travel Blog: Devil May Care (A new round-the-world travel blog, co-written with my wife)
Parents for Inclusive Education (From my Clinic)

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students

De Novo
Theory and Practice
Liberal Federalism?
Good News, No Foolin'

Nancy Pelosi covers her head and visits the head of John the Baptist.
Vlogging in from Austin.
Omikase/"American Idol"

Jeremy Blachman's Weblog: 2007
Happy Passover
Looking for Advice re: LA
Google Books

Stay of Execution
What I've Learned From This Blog, or My Yellow Underpants
The End
Mid Thirties

Legal Theory Blog
Program Announcement: Summer Programs on the Constitution at George Washington
Book Announement: Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy by Whittington
Entry Level Hiring Report

The Volokh Conspiracy
Making the Daily Show:
Civil unions pass New Hampshire House:
Profile of Yale Law Dean Harold Koh:

Crescat Sententia
Hillary II
Politics and Principal/Agents

Law Dork
Election Approaches
Following Lewis
New Jersey High Court: 'Same Rights and Benefits'

Surveying the revival
Birds of paradise

Half the Sins of Mankind
Cheney Has Spoken Religious conservatives who may ...
Does Ahmadinejad Know Christianity Better Than MSN...
Borders as Genocide In discussions of climate chan...

For lovers of garden gnomes...and any China-freaks out there
We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming

Does SOX explain the flight from NY?
More Litvak on SOX effect on cross-listed firms
What did the market learn from internal controls reporting?

The Yin Blog
Iowa City = Riyadh
Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court"
Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?

Letters of Marque
And there we are

Signing Off

Dark Bilious Vapors
Jim (The Waco Kid): Where you headed, cowboy?
Bart: Nowhere special.
Jim: Nowhere special. I always wanted to go there.
Bart: Come on.
--"Blazing Saddles"

Technical Difficulties... please stand by....
The Onion should have gotten a patent first....

Legal Ethics Forum
Interesting new Expert DQ case
Decency, Due Care, and The Yoo-Delahunty Memorandum
Thinking About the Fired U.S. Attorneys

Ex Post
Student Symposium- Chicago!
More Hmong - Now at Law School
Good Samaritan Laws: Good For America?

Appellate Law & Practice
Those turned over documents
CA1: courts can’t help people acquitted of crimes purge the taint of acquitted conduct
CA1: restrictions on chain liquor stores in Rhode Island are STILL okay

the imbroglio
High schoolers turn in plagiarism screeners for copyright infringement
Paris to offer 20,600 bikes at 1,450 stations to rent by the end of the year

The Republic of T.
The Secret of the Snack Attack
links for 2007-04-04
Where You Link is What You Get

Distractions for stressed law students

The Other Side: Twisted AnimationsSomething Positive, a truly good webcomic

Syndicate This Site



Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot