« Introspective Wonderland and the Ideologically Balanced Academic World | Main | Hollywood Hates Us »

God, Profit, and Philip Pullman

Will Baude and Maureen Craig both express regret that Hollywood will be casting God out of the movie version of Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials movies. In a sense, I'll agree without much surprise: I mean, given the hash they're making of Constantine, what did anyone expect? Hollywood doesn't deal well with the whole "Heaven/Hell" thing.

If the news story is true, and they're rewriting it so that the Authority is some secular force, then I wonder if Hollywood hasn't misread Red State America again. Despite New Line's claim that, ""You have to recognise that [making money on such a movie] is a challenge in the climate of Bush's America," I get the sense that much of Red State America would flock to see a special-effects laden film that purports to tell a story of a God-who-could-be. If sensitivity were absolutely necessary, there are a dozen sensitive disclaimers one could run at the beginning of the film.

But I'm not about to go so far as to say that, in Will's words, this movie will be "a gladiator thrusting at lions of his own imagining." I appreciated Pullman's books because he has a gift for beautiful, descriptive language; because the worlds and the metaphysic he put forward held a depth and richness seldom seen in children's fiction; and because--I'll admit it--much of it took place in an alternate Oxford, so there was that ring of familiarity. All of that will likely remain in the movie if it's handled carefully. As for the "battle against God" that is supposed to be the heart of the book: I'm not sure that losing it will lose that much.

I don't remember the specifics of the books all that well (and I gave away my copies when I left England), so I can't say more than my remembered impressions, but I know that it struck me as the sort of argument against God made by atheists for atheists: a fairly interesting idea, but one that basically detailed a war against a Gnostic demiurge. Further, the characters who were supposed to be the most driven by either rebellion, religion, or corruption, especially Lord Asriel and Ms. Coulter, just didn't strike me as real. Certainly I remember being unsatisfied by the conclusion of their tale. Let's put it this way: I enjoyed the books themselves, but I've never felt the urge to use any of Pullman's theological ideas as an example in a 4 AM coffee/alcohol-inspired college chat session.

So perhaps--and this is a big maybe--taking the God out of the novel will be an improvement: by the end, the characters might be a little less pantomime, their fullness not lost against the backdrop of the War in Heaven. True, it's a slender reed on which to hold out hope, but perhaps?

covercovercover

While I'm at it, can anyone recommend (or otherwise) the following two books? I'll need a bit of holiday reading in a few days...
covercover

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference God, Profit, and Philip Pullman:

» Getting it Right from Crescat Sententia
Maureen Craig agrees with me that Dark Materials without God is like a gladiator thrusting at lions of his own imagining. (My post's here). However, she also trivializes the importance of the who-shot-first-in-the-Cantina debate; but that debate is imp... [Read More]

Comments

My friend does monthly book recommendations. You can find them at Swan Tower, MB side, under recommendations. Jonathan Strange is August's selection.
I would read Tiger in the Well only if you've read the rest of the series (but I'm a purest about things like that). My primary school-self enjoyed the book, so take this as a highly qualified recommendation.
I read half of Jonathan Strange before being pulled away for the same reasons you've put down the Hebrew Goddess. I was enjoying it, although I found it a little directionless, and I thinks it's a little short on the sort of ideological sophistication you seem to enjoy. It's more a clever and amusing diversion than an exploration of ideas. Think Harry Potter, not Narnia.
Ew, no. Don't think Harry Potter. Think Jane Austen and Charles Dickens. With a bit of Tolkien, a little Pullman, maybe some Neil Gaiman, maybe not. I loved Strange & Norrell. It explored the natures of magic, madness, and 19th-century London society. Plus it's funny. You might not find theological depth (I just found this site by looking for law blogs - I don't know your tastes), but you'll find depth of story, and historical scholarship, and character.
I just tried to post, and I think it was lost. Strange & Norrell is great. Please DO NOT think Harry Potter; think Jane Austen and Charles Dickens at their finest. Clarke's story has depth of story, historical scholarship, and character that is unmatched in any other book this year.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Giving The Devil His Due

And like that... he is gone (8)
Bateleur wrote: I tip my hat to you - not only for ... [more]

Law Firm Technology (5)
Len Cleavelin wrote: I find it extremely difficult to be... [more]

Post Exam Rant (9)
Tony the Pony wrote: Humbug. Allowing computers already... [more]

Symbols, Shame, and A Number of Reasons that Billy Idol is Wrong (11)
Adam wrote: Well, here's a spin on the theory o... [more]

I've Always Wanted to Say This: What Do You Want? (14)
gcr wrote: a nice cozy victorian in west phill... [more]

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

cover
D.C. Noir

My city. But darker.
cover
A Clockwork Orange

About time I read this...


Shopping

Projects I've Been Involved With

A Round-the-World Travel Blog: Devil May Care (A new round-the-world travel blog, co-written with my wife)
Parents for Inclusive Education (From my Clinic)

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students