This study renders men acute, inquisitive, dexterous, prompt in attack, ready in defence, full of resources
Some days the humour fades, the eyes get heavy, and the spirit seems weary and unwilling. No matter how one tries to put a brave face on it, the smallest things start to bring one down, even when you are caught up in your work and feeling like you understand the law--or at least your lessons. Today my nemesis was the pressure to pay $100 to Barbri for bar examination test prep, not because that's on my horizon at the moment, but because it's the last day to do so before they threaten to raise prices. LSATs, tuition, commercial outlines, Barbri, Bar exam fees--there are times when it feels like your whole point in existence is to pay for exams.
In this mood I wandered into Contracts, where I sit in the front row. Prof. Contracts, a cheerful curmudgeon who is constantly telling us to look at our cases with a healthy dose of cynicism, bore the full brunt of my own. "You know, I started this education with the thought that 'LAW IS A RACKET.' It makes so much more sense when you look at it that way." Then I obstinately chomped on a jellybean provided to me by Barbri as yet another of the peripheral bribes one finds here.
To his credit, he asked what I meant and listened when I said that sometimes it seems there's an obscene amount of money floating around this school and the legal system in general. He commented on the parts of the debate that are old: whether the bar exam is guild-like, and whether the third year of law school is actually necessary. Then he started class, and briefly commented on what he'd just been talking about.
His response was just to quote Edmund Burke, in his statement to Parliament regarding their soon-to-be-rebellious colonies. Along with English descent, a tradition of democracy, religious fervor in the north, manner and mores in the south, and the trials of distance, Burke specifically cited the strength and prevalence of a legal education as one of the foundations of Americans' love of liberty.
In no country perhaps in the world is the law so general a study. The profession itself is numerous and powerful; and in most provinces it takes the lead.... I hear that they have sold nearly as many of Blackstone's Commentaries in America as in England.... This study renders men acute, inquisitive, dexterous, prompt in attack, ready in defence, full of resources. In other countries, the people, more simple, and of a less mercurial cast, judge of an ill principle in government only by an actual grievance; here they anticipate the evil, and judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principle. They augur misgovernment at a distance; and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze.
And then we went on to discuss the parol evidence rule and the meaning of the word 'chicken.' But whatever, it put things into a bit of context for me, into a bit of purpose. There's a time and a place for cynicism, but you don't live there.








Comments
And just how many different meanings are there for the word 'chicken'?
Posted by: Forgone Conclusion | October 29, 2003 07:46 PM
From Webster's Online:
CHICKEN AS NOUN
1 a : the common domestic fowl (Gallus gallus) especially when young; also : its flesh used as food -- compare JUNGLE FOWL b : any of various birds or their young
2 : a young woman
3 a : COWARD b : any of various contests in which the participants risk personal safety in order to see which one will give up first
4 [short for chickenshit] slang : petty details
5 : a young male homosexual
CHICKEN AS ADJECTIVE
1 a : SCARED b : TIMID, COWARDLY
2 slang a : insistent on petty details of duty or discipline b : PETTY, UNIMPORTANT
CHICKEN AS INTRANSITIVE VERB
Inflected Form(s): chick·ened; chick·en·ing /'chi-k&n-i[ng], 'chik-ni[ng]/
Date: 1943
: to lose one's nerve -- usually used with out
Posted by: Dave | October 29, 2003 10:24 PM
I suppose I should have left a reference. The case involved with the definition of the word chicken is Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp., 190 F.Supp. 116.
For those who don't have LEXIS or Westlaw, the case can be found here:
http://www.scu.edu/law/FacWebPage/Neustadter/e-books/abridged/main/cases/FrigalimentInterp.html
Posted by: A. Rickey | October 29, 2003 10:27 PM
Hold on just a second....
You're not even out of your first semester of law school, and you're already paying Bar-Bri for the privelige of attending your bar examination review course, which you won't be taking for about another two and a half years (or longer if you take time out from your law studies; I've known a few law students that have done so)?
Damn, I'm glad I'm not a law student anymore.
By way of comment on Burke, though, I'll point out that when Burke was writing, there weren't any such things as law schools. Law study was done the good old way: reading your Blackstone by the fire, like Abe Lincoln. And look how he turned out.
And some people think there's such a thing as progress. ;-)
pfzcPosted by: Len Cleavelin | October 30, 2003 12:55 PM
Ah yes, but your firm will most likely PAY YOU BACK for BARBRI.
It's a sick little system.
powlia vsduaiwPosted by: Paul Gutman | October 31, 2003 12:48 PM