« On a more lighthearted note | Main | One Good Reason Not To Work In Washington »

Strange Google Update

For those who care about such things, a brief discussion of Google's latest update, and how it's affected the blogs I read.

Google has updated its index and altered its Page Ranks. Yours truly has now been demoted from a PR6 to PR5. (Probably more what I deserve, as I've commented before.) Some other sites I watch, such as Serious Law Student, The Yin Blog,
and Ambivalent Imbroglio made what seems to be the same drop. En Banc remains PR6, unaffected.

Just a gut-level hunch here, but I think Google revised how it ranks links in comment fields from well-known blogs. (Many of these link back to the blogs of the commentators.) I've gotten more links recently than at any other time on my blog, and my readership is stable and growing. I wonder if somehow the fact that I leave a link when I comment elsewhere has worked against me?

That said, Letters of Marque and Stay of Execution both retained PR6. Both of them have had highly linked posts in the recent past, so it may be the effect of time. (My two most-linked, on Paris Hilton and Freddy v. Jason, are now quite old.) I'll update as I get some more information.


TrackBack URL for this entry:


I don't understand what the page rank is. Can you explain? The way I imagine it is you get a different page rank as the result of a different query -- so if it's done right I would merit a higher PR for someone searching "Scheherazade Stay of Execution" than for someone searching "Britney Spears Esq. pics". More info, please....
Right, I think that Steve, my favorite Google consultant (his blog is here), would be better to ask, but here's my understanding: Google works mainly through analysing link patterns: a page is considered more authorative for a subject depending upon the links from other pages that link to it. It also makes a difference what kind of link it is: if I link to your site with the words bankruptcy lawyer, it bumps your site up more in the rankings for the term 'bankruptcy lawyer' than if I link via your name but mention the term several times on my site. (This is why I keep linking to Steve with the term "Google Consultant": I'd like him to own the term. And my analysis below explains why I'm not doing it here.) Your page's pagerank is a measure of the authority that Google gives to the referring page with reference to the referrer. So for instance, it considered my links to you more important when I had a PR6 than when I had a PR5. Search engine optimisation specialists like sites with a high page rank, because they're useful for manipulating Google. Suppose I have a product (a PDA, for instance) whose site I want top-ranked for the term 'PDA.' I might send a free unit to several influential blogs/sites/etc. asking for a link to the product with 'PDA' in the link. Your authority is determined by a lot of things, including how many people link to you. Now, here's why I think that Google's PR calculations now give links in comments negative weighting. From what I can tell, your site, my site, and AI's get similar amounts of traffic, certainly within orders of magnitude. Your entry in Technorati isn't appreciably better than mine or AI's. However, he and I are frequent commentators on other blogs, to a degree you're not. Each of those comments will leave a link back to our sites in the comment field. I think these are now being counted against us--hence your remaining at PR6, and our drop. (We all rose to PR6 in the update before last, if I recall correctly.) Now, why might Google do this? I can think of one very good reason: it radically discourages comment spam. After all, if by spamming blogs you're only hurting your own standing, there's an awful lot less point in doing it. All this is guesswork, although I'm working on some empirical testing. I'm authoring all my comments in other blogs with an alternative URL that uses .htaccess to forward the user to my real website. If I'm correct (and Google hasn't compensated for this tactic), I'll start rising back towards PR6 in the next update. I'm using AI for a control in this admittedly unscientific experiment.
You've got it mostly right Tony, except your points about things 'counting against' you and about the linking copy (the anchor text). From both my experience and from the explicit statements from Google representatives, such adjustments by Google to reduce the over-influence of high PR blogs, will never count against you, they will simply not count for you. It has been this way with forum posts for some time. Google no longer considers the links on forum posts as relevant, so regardless of your attempts to spam them, Google will ignore you and significantly won't actually penalise you. Anchor text itself does not contribute directly to PageRank. PageRank is exclusively about the pattern of link relationships between sites and their relative weighting. You will notice also that when checking a site's inbound links on Google, using the Link operator in a search, only those sites with a PR4 tend to show. (I use Alexa.com to get a broader picture of inbound links). Generally the notion of an 'authority' site is more conceptual than defined and empirical. Basically you have to have a good PR for your sector, lower reciprocity in your linking and good relevance of the anchor text to the site content, but beyond that you either know it or you don't. The over-influence of blog trackbacks appears to be being tackled separately as we no longer get empty trackback pages winning fairly high profile searches (The Register reported on this last October). Hope that helps.
Good advice. My blog is http://zombielogic.myblogsite.com/blog

Post a comment

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Giving The Devil His Due

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

D.C. Noir

My city. But darker.
A Clockwork Orange

About time I read this...


Projects I've Been Involved With

A Round-the-World Travel Blog: Devil May Care (A new round-the-world travel blog, co-written with my wife)
Parents for Inclusive Education (From my Clinic)

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students

De Novo
Theory and Practice
Liberal Federalism?
Good News, No Foolin'

Nancy Pelosi covers her head and visits the head of John the Baptist.
Vlogging in from Austin.
Omikase/"American Idol"

Jeremy Blachman's Weblog: 2007
Happy Passover
Looking for Advice re: LA
Google Books

Stay of Execution
What I've Learned From This Blog, or My Yellow Underpants
The End
Mid Thirties

Legal Theory Blog
Program Announcement: Summer Programs on the Constitution at George Washington
Book Announement: Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy by Whittington
Entry Level Hiring Report

The Volokh Conspiracy
Making the Daily Show:
Civil unions pass New Hampshire House:
Profile of Yale Law Dean Harold Koh:

Crescat Sententia
Hillary II
Politics and Principal/Agents

Law Dork
Election Approaches
Following Lewis
New Jersey High Court: 'Same Rights and Benefits'

Surveying the revival
Birds of paradise

Half the Sins of Mankind
Cheney Has Spoken Religious conservatives who may ...
Does Ahmadinejad Know Christianity Better Than MSN...
Borders as Genocide In discussions of climate chan...

For lovers of garden gnomes...and any China-freaks out there
We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming

Does SOX explain the flight from NY?
More Litvak on SOX effect on cross-listed firms
What did the market learn from internal controls reporting?

The Yin Blog
Iowa City = Riyadh
Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court"
Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?

Letters of Marque
And there we are

Signing Off

Dark Bilious Vapors
Jim (The Waco Kid): Where you headed, cowboy?
Bart: Nowhere special.
Jim: Nowhere special. I always wanted to go there.
Bart: Come on.
--"Blazing Saddles"

Technical Difficulties... please stand by....
The Onion should have gotten a patent first....

Legal Ethics Forum
Interesting new Expert DQ case
Decency, Due Care, and The Yoo-Delahunty Memorandum
Thinking About the Fired U.S. Attorneys

Ex Post
Student Symposium- Chicago!
More Hmong - Now at Law School
Good Samaritan Laws: Good For America?

Appellate Law & Practice
Those turned over documents
CA1: courts can’t help people acquitted of crimes purge the taint of acquitted conduct
CA1: restrictions on chain liquor stores in Rhode Island are STILL okay

the imbroglio
High schoolers turn in plagiarism screeners for copyright infringement
Paris to offer 20,600 bikes at 1,450 stations to rent by the end of the year

The Republic of T.
The Secret of the Snack Attack
links for 2007-04-04
Where You Link is What You Get

Distractions for stressed law students

The Other Side: Twisted AnimationsSomething Positive, a truly good webcomic

Syndicate This Site



Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot