« One Mistake, Two Mistake, Red Mistake, Blue Mistake | Main | Addictive Timewaster »

On Reflection, Maybe I Was A Bit Naive....

In the comments to my entry about how useful the Sony Reader electronic book would be for law students, Anon made a good point:

There's certainly a lot to be said for the new technology. Digitized texts save paper (read--fewer trees we have to chop down in the rain forests), spare our backs (read--fewer visits to the chiropractor), and bless us with shorter lines (read--fewer dirty looks from underpaid law school book store register clerks with watch timers set to ring at 5 p.m., the start of favorite bar's happy hour).

I wonder, though, whether these texts will quickly make the transition to paperless, digital format. Digital content is great for the user, but problems of piracy and copyright infringement loom large for the publisher and copyright holder. I suppose if the piracy protection were ironclad, we would be OK, but it seems that almost as quickly as new anti-piracy schemes are cooked up, ways to overcome the protections are crafted. At least if I were the publisher, all of this would make me think twice before digitizing all or part of casebook content.

To which I now feel I might have been overoptimistic in replying:
If I recall correctly from looking at the Japanese model, there's some reasonably robust anti-copying software involved. But I think law school textbooks would have even better protection. Each law student is told when we start school that our personal ethical record will eventually form part of our bar acceptance. Given the high price of tuition and the three years of lost wages, would a student really make illegal copies of textbooks if they felt it might prevent them from passing the bar?

I'm pretty certain that worries about bar passage would have some effect on illegally pirating textbooks. But taking a look at what I've spent on books over the last few years, I think I might be a trifle . . . shortsighted in my response above. Any thoughts from other students?


TrackBack URL for this entry:


Dude, never add up the cost of law school! Ever!
I think a lot of that depends on the likelihood of getting caught. Law students are inherently conservative (not necessarily politically) and risk-averse, which lends credence to the point you made, but if the enforcement mechanisms aren't there (and visibly active) and the penalties sufficiently stiff, students might be lulled into thinking pirating is no big deal and not worry too much about the small risk of getting caught. Ultimately, students would be making a cost-benefit/risk analysis (as we often do) to determine whether the costs (getting caught, punished, and possibly refused a bar license) outweigh the benefits (saving $400 or so on books each semester) in light of the chances the costs would ever be realized. You're right that any anti-piracy software would be formidable (West and their ilk would have it no other way), but I feel confident that young and able hackers would find ways to circumvent the technology. There might also be some money in it for them if they decide to sell bootlegged copies of the digital texts to penny-pinched law students for cheap.
Copyright laws and policies are tremendously politically subjective things. It would be a travesty of justice if people were prevented from practicing law because they didn't conform to the law and policies du jour of that period when they were in law school. Yes, copyright is in a statute and laws are laws, but in the age of copyright cartels hijacking Congress to write those laws exclusively according to their interests it's worth cutting infringers a little slack. Especially since it's not like these are unambiguous laws with crystal clear, consistent interpretations that necessarily even foreclose students accessing and using books they didn't necessarily pay for (remember libraries?) Using the threat of non-acceptance to the Bar as a way to enforce conformity with one political viewpoint of what these laws should be would therefore be extremely unjust.
Considering the number of professors within a law school whose own books are assigned to the students therein, I don't think the school would be as inclined to cut slack there as it would be for students who, say, piss off the RIAA. Even if law professors mostly are paid enough in salary that lost royalties aren't going to make a huge dent in their income, they're nonetheless going to be inclined to enforce that particular hegemonic view of the law. Admittedly the only professor with whose book I've had close contact said that he could make more money in two hours of consulting than he would on the royalties, but that may have been due to its narrow readership and little original content (being composed mostly of others' copyrighted work).
I just don't want to read digital books. My eyeballs are fried enough from the constant laptop as it is (read: expensive corrective lenses for the rest of my life), and I'm not sure that our abused legal eyes could take much more...
3L: Seriously, you'd have to see the Sony Reader to understand, but it's not like reading off an LCD. There's no backlight, and it doesn't burn your eyes. That's what makes it so beautiful. I used one for about an hour, and if felt like reading a book.
Hello i write for the Daily Telegraph in the UK, Happened across your site when researching a feature I'm doing for our book pages. Would like to get your comments on the Sony if it suits you. need you to reply rather urgently. Thanks M

Post a comment

NOTICE TO SPAMMERS, COMMENT ROBOTS, TRACKBACK SPAMMERS AND OTHER NON-HUMAN VISITORS: No comment or trackback left via a robot is ever welcome at Three Years of Hell. Your interference imposes significant costs upon me and my legitimate users. The owner, user or affiliate who advertises using non-human visitors and leaves a comment or trackback on this site therefore agrees to the following: (a) they will pay fifty cents (US$0.50) to Anthony Rickey (hereinafter, the "Host") for every spam trackback or comment processed through any blogs hosted on threeyearsofhell.com, morgrave.com or housevirgo.com, irrespective of whether that comment or trackback is actually posted on the publicly-accessible site, such fees to cover Host's costs of hosting and bandwidth, time in tending to your comment or trackback and costs of enforcement; (b) if such comment or trackback is published on the publicly-accessible site, an additional fee of one dollar (US$1.00) per day per URL included in the comment or trackback for every day the comment or trackback remains publicly available, such fee to represent the value of publicity and search-engine placement advantages.

Giving The Devil His Due

Choose Stylesheet

What I'm Reading

D.C. Noir

My city. But darker.
A Clockwork Orange

About time I read this...


Projects I've Been Involved With

A Round-the-World Travel Blog: Devil May Care (A new round-the-world travel blog, co-written with my wife)
Parents for Inclusive Education (From my Clinic)

Syndicated from other sites

The Columbia Continuum
Other Blogs by CLS students

De Novo
Theory and Practice
Liberal Federalism?
Good News, No Foolin'

Nancy Pelosi covers her head and visits the head of John the Baptist.
Vlogging in from Austin.
Omikase/"American Idol"

Jeremy Blachman's Weblog: 2007
Happy Passover
Looking for Advice re: LA
Google Books

Stay of Execution
What I've Learned From This Blog, or My Yellow Underpants
The End
Mid Thirties

Legal Theory Blog
Program Announcement: Summer Programs on the Constitution at George Washington
Book Announement: Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy by Whittington
Entry Level Hiring Report

The Volokh Conspiracy
Making the Daily Show:
Civil unions pass New Hampshire House:
Profile of Yale Law Dean Harold Koh:

Crescat Sententia
Hillary II
Politics and Principal/Agents

Law Dork
Election Approaches
Following Lewis
New Jersey High Court: 'Same Rights and Benefits'

Surveying the revival
Birds of paradise

Half the Sins of Mankind
Cheney Has Spoken Religious conservatives who may ...
Does Ahmadinejad Know Christianity Better Than MSN...
Borders as Genocide In discussions of climate chan...

For lovers of garden gnomes...and any China-freaks out there
We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming

Does SOX explain the flight from NY?
More Litvak on SOX effect on cross-listed firms
What did the market learn from internal controls reporting?

The Yin Blog
Iowa City = Riyadh
Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court"
Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?

Letters of Marque
And there we are

Signing Off

Dark Bilious Vapors
Jim (The Waco Kid): Where you headed, cowboy?
Bart: Nowhere special.
Jim: Nowhere special. I always wanted to go there.
Bart: Come on.
--"Blazing Saddles"

Technical Difficulties... please stand by....
The Onion should have gotten a patent first....

Legal Ethics Forum
Interesting new Expert DQ case
Decency, Due Care, and The Yoo-Delahunty Memorandum
Thinking About the Fired U.S. Attorneys

Ex Post
Student Symposium- Chicago!
More Hmong - Now at Law School
Good Samaritan Laws: Good For America?

Appellate Law & Practice
Those turned over documents
CA1: courts can’t help people acquitted of crimes purge the taint of acquitted conduct
CA1: restrictions on chain liquor stores in Rhode Island are STILL okay

the imbroglio
High schoolers turn in plagiarism screeners for copyright infringement
Paris to offer 20,600 bikes at 1,450 stations to rent by the end of the year

The Republic of T.
The Secret of the Snack Attack
links for 2007-04-04
Where You Link is What You Get

Distractions for stressed law students

The Other Side: Twisted AnimationsSomething Positive, a truly good webcomic

Syndicate This Site



Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot